http://moots.com/bbpress/tags.php?tag=halloween-outlet Rider's community and more. en-US Sun, 19 May 2013 10:35:04 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://moots.com/bbpress/search.php http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=94#post-123836 Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:15:25 +0000 Milo11 123836@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p><a href="http://shoesbuttomred.net/pumps.html">red pumps</a> scabbard that homes it had been air restricted and assisted to protect the sword when not in use <a href="http://shoesbuttomred.net">louboutin</a> . The 32 <a href="http://shoesbuttomred.net">replica christian louboutin</a> .twenty five inch reproduction Historic King of Yue sword with brass deal with is tarnish cost-free which can be a unusual trait, a variety of sword collectors discover this attribute and they are drawn to this truth. This sword will not be only renowned for its record or the way it was produced but for that sheer type it shows. Plenty of on the artifacts from dynasties previous were not preserved as properly and just some components remained. The sheer craftsmanship from the King of Yue Sword makes it possible for it to face out merely due to the look which it stays sharp the many tireplique bijouxme. Several who acquire swords notice the replication and all who research this duplicate marvel at its depth. <a href="http://shoesbuttomred.net/tall-boots.html">christian louboutin studded boots</a> <a href="http://shoesbuttomred.net/classic-collection.html">louboutins</a> When you have an eye fixed for swords then thirepliques montres s just one has really potentially caught yours at the moment. The 32.twenty five inch reproduction Historical King of Yue </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=7#post-123817 Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:23:16 +0000 Milo11 123817@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>reproduction purses have just about the exact same capabilities that designer purses posses in addition to very tough, with out a unique observation even some bag specialists cannot differentiate the replicas and authentic kinds, you don't have to fear about staying disclosed when having a reproduction designer bag <a href="http://shoesbuttomred.net/autumn-collection.html">red heels</a> . <a href="http://shoesbuttomred.net">louboutin shoes</a> When you have to allow me to show you the evident difference among designer purse and knockoff bag <a href="http://shoesbuttomred.net/short-boots.html">short boots</a> , I'll definitely let you know it's the value tag. One designer purse you may need to own to fork off one thousand bucks, but one designer reproduction purse you only will require to commit about a hundred and fifty to three hundred bucks. When purchasing knockoff purses <a href="http://shoesbuttomred.net">christian louboutin outlet</a> , you should make good that you will be attaining your moneys worthy of. Some inadequate reputed companies might incredibly nicely offer reproduction purses in the price of designer purses <a href="http://shoesbuttomred.net">christian louboutin silver shoes</a> , and that means you should examination the bag meticulously to avoid currently being cheated. Once you decide to receive low-cost </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=21822#post-28001 Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:25:17 +0000 JonC 28001@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>bigwheels,</p> <p>New stock arriving anytime now.....</p> <p>Yep, us too....getting colder with a big Pacific storm headed our way in the next 24 hours.......</p> <p>thanks,</p> <p>Jon@Moots </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=21822#post-26764 Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:50:57 +0000 bigwheels 26764@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>YO GATOR-</p> <p>Any plans to get more wool beanies in stock? ETA? Gettin' cold in Wisco....</p> <p>All the best-</p> <p>bw </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=4946#post-8037 Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:49:36 +0000 cento1 8037@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Hi John, , my vamoots was built 12/28/2011,,is this new TT slope(3.6 deg) or still the pre 2012 (2.1 deg) TT slope ? I knew you've changed the vamoots geometry this year,, thanks </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=4946#post-8034 Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:18:42 +0000 JonC 8034@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>surfsailride,<br /> There an no differences between the 2010 and 2012 Vamoots CR....changes happened from 2009 to 2010....slight top tube lenght changes, head tube lenghts and seat tube lenghts all changed between '09 &amp; '10 models.</p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>Jon@Moots </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=4946#post-8033 Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:18:41 +0000 JonC 8033@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>surfsailride,<br /> There an no differences between the 2010 and 2012 Vamoots CR....changes happened from 2009 to 2010....slight top tube lenght changes, head tube lenghts and seat tube lenghts all changed between '09 &amp; '10 models.</p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>Jon@Moots </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=4946#post-8028 Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:52:52 +0000 surfsailride 8028@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Does anyone know the major differences between a 2010 and 2012 Vamoots CR, if there are any? </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2237#post-4731 Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:19:10 +0000 Mojo Man 4731@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>I think I’ve finally put this standover height issue to bed, hopefully, but at times my mind plays tricks on my decisions.</p> <p>I got a print of my last frame which was a med size Lynskey (just sold it for this Moots build) and it felt pretty good for S.O. clearance. Come to realize from the print that (Lysnkey) measures not far from the nose of the seat. So, taking this into consideration I would be comparing the Lyskey’s TT height of 30.4” to the YBB height which I’m guessing is around 30” (bend area of TT).</p> <p>Also when measuring the middle of the TT, I came up with a measurement very similar to the YBB, good news also.</p> <p>Thanks for everyone’s opinion on this.</p> <p>At times I’m very indecisive and therefore let my wife make most of the decisions, except for Mtn bikes. My wife says I tend to over analyze everything and that’s one of the problems I’m having with this build, too many choices.</p> <p>Mojo </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2237#post-4724 Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:34:23 +0000 29ner 4724@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>And I should have proof read my 2nd post......'sent', not 'send'. Man, I did pretty well back in 3rd grade english. You're sweating a detail that, in your case, is not a detail. Get the bike - you will not believe it. </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2237#post-4722 Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:24:10 +0000 egordon 4722@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Plus 1 what Fubar Said </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2237#post-4720 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:55:28 +0000 Mojo Man 4720@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Since it's my post, I will let it go this one time, LOL</p> <p>Mojo </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2237#post-4719 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:19:33 +0000 29ner 4719@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>I should have proof read my response before I send it. A couple of mis-spells - sorry about that. </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2237#post-4718 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:19:29 +0000 Mojo Man 4718@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Yes, I agree with everyone to a certain extent. </p> <p>I’m basically trying to make an 18” into a 17”. With that being said, and since I have to go the custom route for a 23” ETTL, it would have been nice to take it a step further and get the typical 17” standover height while still keeping the new sexy looking curved TT. </p> <p>I think Moots is discriminating against us smaller riders. LOL</p> <p>For the money, I just want my cake and to eat it too. </p> <p>Thanks for the replies and opinions. They all help with my decision making.</p> <p>Mojo </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2237#post-4716 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:04:56 +0000 29ner 4716@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>I think I agree with all three replys. a. You are beating this to death, b. it is way overated, c. if still unsure - get a drawing and/or exact measure.</p> <p>a. At 5'8" and nearly 32" inseam, you will have zero clearance issues. That is a long inseam for 5'8". I'd put you on a 17" without batting an eye.</p> <p>b. Agree with Fubar. Top tube and crotch incidents are highly over stated (although probably not over rated). Not saying it can't/won't happen, but when was the last time a shark attacked you? It just doesn't happen. Particularily with a curved tt and 32" inseam. A non-issue.</p> <p>c. If you are affraid of sharks, get the drawing - but that is a hard number and it will be affected by what tire/fork/shoe you ride. </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2237#post-4708 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:15:14 +0000 JonC 4708@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Mojo Man,<br /> Reducing the head tube lenght will not help too much....maybe .25 of an inch in standover. Also, we cannot increase the bend due to tooling costs...in order to bend the tube more would require a massive amount of time and money to build a new bender for just this bike. My advice:</p> <p>Get into a Moots dealer and have them contact us here at Moots so we can start a drawing to clairify standover via CAD drawing. This will put an end to those concerns and next thing you know, you'll be on order for your new Moots.</p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>Jon@Moots </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2237#post-4706 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:28:54 +0000 teamfubar 4706@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Mojo Man,</p> <p>Personally, I think the whole "stand-over" clearance thing is WAY overrated. I cannot remember the last time I jumped off my bike in an emergency situation and nailed the top tube. The bike is usually leaned over to the side when that type of maneuver is needed. </p> <p>My last couple bikes have been sized on the top tube length, which affects your reach and head tube length which positions the bars. I've come out perfectly on both occasions. I think if you fit the 18" when you're on it and not necessarily when you're standing over it, then that's the one I'd ride. </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2237#post-4705 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:29:19 +0000 Mojo Man 4705@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>I know I’m beating this to death but has anyone swung a leg over the new 2012 Mooto X YBB 29r 18” with a similar inseam of 31.7” (80.5 cm)?</p> <p> I’m unsure of the stand over clearance I will have even with the new top tube profile, I know it will help but not sure how much. I don’t want to go the 17” strut route, and don’t know how much reducing the head tube length from 12cm to 10cm will help.</p> <p>If Moots could only increase the bend a small amount I’d send my deposit immediately to my dealer.</p> <p>Any opinions would be appreciated.</p> <p>It’s tougher than I thought becoming a Moots owner.</p> <p>Mojo </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=843&page=2#post-4637 Fri, 25 Nov 2011 04:13:11 +0000 tbill 4637@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>HillBilly, that's exactly what I did a couple of years ago, and I have never had a squeak from the bb. The cranks are fantastic. Anyone out there considering putting Campagnolo on a ti (or other metal frame) frame with BB30 or PF BB30 owes it to themselves to put the SiSL crank on (either with Campagnolo rings if standard, or FSA rings if compact). </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2162#post-4593 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:58:31 +0000 Mojo Man 4593@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Jon,</p> <p>Thanks for the reply, I guess the closer I get to pulling the trigger, the more uncertainty I have with the geo.</p> <p>Anyway, what got me thinking was a resent mud race I did on my carbon bonger and having to put my foot down while trying to get through some of the muddy turns. Boy that TT seamed really close at times.</p> <p>Mojo </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2162#post-4588 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:27:16 +0000 JonC 4588@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Mojo Man,<br /> I believe you will be fine on the 17'' Moots, the 16'' will be too small.....keep in mind; stand over height is not everything. It does matter, but take in account that you will have cycling shoes on that will lengthen your inseam..... Also keep in mind we are being very truthful about our stand over height. Real tires, real location on the top tube where the rider is likely to stand....I can't speak for other companies but many embellish the stand over by using a less than real world tire choice and measure further back on the top tube towards the seat tube in order to print a lower stand over. </p> <p>That's my .2</p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>Jon@Moots </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=2162#post-4587 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:18:43 +0000 Mojo Man 4587@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>This stand over measurement has me somewhat confused with the Moots 29r HT frames. At 5’8” and an inseam of 31.7” most if not all dealers put me on a 16.5 to 17” size frame (based on a ETT length of 23-23.7”). But with a Moots 17 frame, the measured stand over is still a whopping 31.4 (Moot-X, RSL, 23 ETTL, 100mm fork). </p> <p> Most of the other frames I’ve looked at come in at least 1” lower. Not sure how this is possible because most HT 29r frames in that size are using the same length head tube, so the top tube height at the Head Tube junction (weldment) should be very similar, no?</p> <p>So, is this a typical measurement inconsistency to where everyone is measuring? I guess my real question is whether the higher Moots stand over (or where it is measured) will work for my inseam length? I really want the 23-23.5" ETTL so the 16 size is just too small. </p> <p>Trying to buy a frame without swinging a leg over is more challenging than I had originally thought.</p> <p>Anyone have any similar body size measurements that can shine some light?</p> <p>Hope I explained it well.</p> <p>Mojo </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=843&page=2#post-4565 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:25:47 +0000 JonC 4565@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>HillBilly,<br /> Thanks for the update! Glad to hear it is all working out. </p> <p>All the best,</p> <p>Jon@Moots </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=843&page=2#post-4557 Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:50:30 +0000 pzung 4557@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Congrats HillBilly. Long journey but worth the wait, eh?</p> <p>Any pictures to share? </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=843&page=2#post-4553 Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:34:35 +0000 HillBilly 4553@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>I thought I'd provide a brief update after my frustration with Campy UT cranks and campy PF30 adapters. </p> <p>I bought a new set of Cannondale Si SL cranks with the new compact EVO Spider and new EVO lockring designed specifically for PF30. I also ordered from Cannondale a PF30 bottom bracket, actually a SRAM but includes required wavy washer and other bits and FSA 11 speed rings in 50/36. My LBS has installed them and I have now put quite a few kms on them. </p> <p>Verdict? Sublime. No hint of noise, stunning shifting and overall performance. This is what an RSL should be like. The bike absolutely rocks! I run an 11-25 cassette and find the 50/36 is the perfect match for where I live and ride (lots hills and gorges). </p> <p>Finally an extremely happy camper. Although I'm long one Super Record Compact Crank with Ti spindle?</p> <p>Cheers</p> <p>Hillbilly </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=843&page=2#post-4290 Sat, 22 Oct 2011 02:40:16 +0000 crank 4290@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>tbill &amp; poff - Did you guys use the 104mm length spindle with the Cannondale Hollowgram cranks on your RSL? Any tricks to setting it up? </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=843&page=2#post-3927 Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:58:05 +0000 JonC 3927@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>River,<br /> Sram makes the Press Fit BB30 cups &amp; bearings. Stainless steel or Ceramic versions. You should be able to pick up at your local dealer.</p> <p>Let me know if you have an other questions.</p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>Jon@Moots </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=843&page=2#post-3877 Sat, 08 Oct 2011 02:01:46 +0000 River 3877@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Need help with best bb30 press fit. With all this talk about Campy cranks I purchased some Cannondale hollowgrams but they came with the standard bb30's. What bb30 press fit works the best with the hollograms for my RSL? </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=1396#post-3638 Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:00:44 +0000 johnny5 3638@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>Solution to rigid forks for the new 100mm travel, White Bros is adding a longer a/c rigid fork to the line up, as well as a sweet fat fork. <a href="http://www.bikerumor.com/2011/09/21/new-rock-solid-rigid-forks-from-white-brothers-plus-color/">http://www.bikerumor.com/2011/09/21/new-rock-solid-rigid-forks-from-white-brothers-plus-color/</a> </p> http://moots.com/bbpress/topic.php?id=843&page=2#post-3624 Thu, 22 Sep 2011 01:54:00 +0000 poff 3624@http://moots.com/bbpress/ <p>I am running hollowgram crank om my RSL. It is stiffer and lighter than campy's + looks cooler IMHO. I run it with a compact SRM spider. Campy 11spd rings are available for hollowgram crank (just get the right spider). Problem solved. Another option is to get Rotor 3D+ with campy rings. </p>